In this case, the protein yield is usually measured at the terminal step of protein purification for simplicity

In this case, the protein yield is usually measured at the terminal step of protein purification for simplicity. a sensitivity of 0.149 ODmL/ng and a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.029?ng/mL. The average recoveries of the assay against the spiked samples Ivacaftor benzenesulfonate were 101.9C106.0% and 100.7C108.0%. The method was applied to a variety of actual samples for the detection of different VHHs in bacterial cell media. High amount of VHHs (up to 41.3?mg/mL), which are comparable to the average yield of VHH in standard production protocols, were detected in the media. This study raises attention to the problem of protein losses in cell culture supernatants and provides a method for the continuous detection of the protein large quantity to optimize the expression and purification protocols especially for nanobodies. Graphical abstract Supplementary Information The online version Rabbit Polyclonal to RPC5 contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-023-04846-w. Keywords: Nanobody, VHH, Protein expression, Sandwich ELISA Introduction has become a popular expression system over the past 50?years. Features such as rapid growth rate at high density, small, well-characterized, and easily modified genome, as well as the availability of numerous mutant strains at low cost make a great host for heterogeneous protein expression [1]. A typical protocol of cytoplasmic protein expression involves a series of separation/purification actions. As the first step of this process, centrifugal fractionation is usually often assumed effective enough to perfectly individual the cells that should contain all of the expressed protein from the used media. However, because of cell death and leakage into the media, the supernatant usually contains a proportion of the target protein [2]. When the protein has an enzyme Ivacaftor benzenesulfonate activity, it is straight-forward to test both cell pellet and supernatant to determine the optimal time to collect the cells to maximize the amount of targeted protein in the pellet. On the other hand, it becomes very difficult to optimize the recombinant protein production when the protein does not possess an enzymatic activity, such as antibodies. In this case, the protein yield is usually measured at the terminal step of protein purification for simplicity. The expression conditions and purification methods that give higher yield are considered more efficient. A limitation of this criterion is usually that one cannot distinguish if the higher yield is usually from good expression or high purification recovery. There is a good chance that the overall production of the purified protein is less than optimal and that a sizeable amount of protein could be lost along the way, underlying the need to quantify the targeted protein at every step of the way for better recovery. Moreover, the optimized purification protocols would reduce the?proportion of?the protein loss in the cell media, but does not guarantee a low quantity of protein lost. Alternatively, Ivacaftor benzenesulfonate the target protein can be retrieved from your cell media by additional purification actions when necessary. However, the currently available methods to extract specific target proteins from cell media are complicated and sometimes costly. Thus, it would be efficient in terms of time and cost to estimate the large quantity of target protein in the cell media before undergoing further purification with a simple and low-cost quantitative method. The accuracy of traditional colorimetric methods for protein Ivacaftor benzenesulfonate quantitation (e.g., UV absorbance (A280/A260), Bradford assay, BCA assay) are limited by the purity of protein samples because they quantify the total amount of proteins rather than a specific target protein [3C7]. In this decade, the advancement of technology has made mass spectrometry (MS) a useful tool for not only protein identification but also protein quantification, especially in proteomic analysis. Common MS-based methods such as MS, MS/MS, and LCCMS/MS are able to quantify proteins or peptides with good sensitivity and reproducibility [8, 9]. But the quantitative sensitivity of MS-based methods is typically lower than that of antibody-based methods. Moreover, these methods are limited by the requirement of complicated pretreatment of samples, high costs of instrument, and experienced operator. None of the methods above could satisfy the need to monitor the intermediate actions of preparation for more comprehensive evaluation of the purification protocols. Hence, developing a simple, effective, and low-cost protein quantification method in the cellular matrix is needed. Accurate quantitation of a single protein in.